Jürgen Gerwing, Siegenerstr. 39, D-57399 Kirchhundem, Europe(C).

_____________________________________________


 

"Es ist wichtig einzusehen, dass wir in der heutigen Physik nicht wissen, was Energie ist. Wir haben kein Bild davon, dass Energie in kleinen Klumpen definierter Größe vorkommt"

 

Physiknobelpreisträger Richard Feynman

 

 

"Energie ist - der bisherigen physikalischen Auffassung folgend - die elektromagnetische Energie des Photons   h f oder eV.

Wenn  das Photon als Wechselwirkungsteilchen des Elektromagnetismus durch den magnetischen Fluss Vs oder U/f  ersetzt wird, lösen sich

die Bedenken von Richard Feynman mit  Quantenspuk und  Heisenbergs Unschärferelation auf.

Neue  Grundlage für die neue Physik ist das erweiterte Ohm'sche Gesetz und der magnetische Fluss U/f .

Das Photon, als Wechselwirkungsteilchen des Elektromagnetismus ist überholt" sagt der Autor.

 

Hinweis  für finnische Universität Oulu

 

Magneticquant = h / Quantity e  in an Atom  = U/f in vakuum

was discovered in April 2009 and not 


 

(Report in New scientist features June, 2014

Oulu team ( The university of Oulu,Department of computer science in Finnland)  explores magnetic communication for Smartphones.


Es folgt eine verkürzte Englisch-sprachige Ausführung der Deutschen Homepage magneticquant.de

mit einer deutschen Debatte im Internet.

 

 

The collapse of a physical world picture?           

Short English version of german thinking collection in homepage magneticquant.de


1. The Einstein approach  m/2 v² + W output = h f is wrong

   

Kinetic energy is a funktion of mass and velocity, potential energy a funktion of h and f.

h f  / Quantity e = U = potential energy in an atom.


h= Planck constant, f = frequency, frequency of resonance, Quantity e = elektrons,

U = voltage. c = 299792458 m/s, H2 = 2 Hydrogen atoms, O oxygen atom,


mass /2 * velocity ² + work output  is not = h f  but h f * frequency of resonance  = h f² =  performance = Watt


H2 + O  is not H2O + energy, but H2O + energy * frequency of resonance of  moving rockets.


A light bulb consumes h f = W s  to stimulate the atoms in filament. Resonance f * h f = h f²= performance = Watt. Electromagnetic

 h f² / electric Quantity e f ² = magnetic flux =

U / f = light = Beam of a Laser pointer.


2. The new extended Ohms law


U = h f / Quantity e  = potential energy I*R in the atom

R = h / Quantity e² in an atom

I = Quantity e f = Lambda/2 of the atom = h c / 2 U Quantity e in mass           

There's no pulse hf / c = h / lambda in space


e = h f / U in Hydrogen atom = h / 4,13566766 * 10 ^-15 Vs

f = U e / h in Hydrogen atom = 0,5 lambda / e of the atom

e / f = h / U = property of the  conduktive crystal lattice

f / e = U / h = property of an insulator


U / f = h / Quantity e = Vs is the magnetic flux from sun to earth

Vs in vacuum  = R Quantity e in mass


When the sun is thought as a spark of a spark plug, the magnetic flux V/f is standing perpondicular to the elektric flux Quantity e f².


Light input in a glassplate : U / f * insulator f / Quantity e =

U² / h f = R * f in glass.  

Light input in a copperplate =

U / f * e / f = U e / f² = h / f = Joule / f² in copper.

        

U e or h f  are not the energies of  photons, but performance h f² / f resonance = phonon h f in mass.


U/ f magnetic sun * ( f / Quantity electrons  in office paper  * electric flux Quantity e f * f resonance * Quantity e / f silverchlorin  in office paper ) = performance U Quantity e f silverchlorin in office paper and air = atomic silver in office paper and atomic chlorin in air


There are no electric photons Ue or h f in vacuum, but the magnetic flux U/f .

There are no electromagnetic waves in vacuum, but in mass.


    3. E = hf is not mc²  
    Gravitation is Delta U of 2 atoms, no baggy space-time continuum. 
    Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is wrong, Quantum no longer haunt

     
    Not photons, but the masses are entangled.   
    There are no photones, there are no electromagnetic waves in vacuum. There is no resistance with ~ 120 Pi =
    376,73 Ohm in vacuum.


    Other definition of the speed of light and the speed
    of electrons.

    c is not = Quantity e f² = lambda / 2 * resonant frequency exothermic in the near field of the light source.

    Speed of light is produced only in the far field of a light source on U * c / f = from the electromagnetic U Quantity  e f of the light source.

    U * c /  f in vacuum =  U Quantity 2 e f in light source.

    Justification: The electron-flux remain in the near of light source. Electrons are not radiated in the far field as the magnetic flux V / f.

    Electrons generate the magnetic flux from sun to earth on sun, you know?
    V / f = Vs  from sun * lamda / 2 * f resonance of a Hydrogen atom on earth = U e f = Watt in the Hyrogen atom on earth.

    Laserpointer : U * c / f  in far field = h f * 0,5 Lambda / e =
    h f ² =  Watt = performance in near field of laser pointer.
     

    0,5 Lambda = h f² / U = Quantity e f = I in mass of

    laserpointer.


Once more with Ohms New Extendet Law, laser  pointer and a white wall on the moon. 


       U = h f / quantity e is potential energy in laser pointer.     

     f  = 0,5 Lambda / Quantity e = U Quantity e / h in laser

     pointer.

     Quantity e f = 0,5 lambda in laser pointer

     U Quantity e f = performance of laser pointer in near field

     U Quantity e f / Quantity e f ² = U / f, the magnetic flux in far

     field of laser pointer.


     U Quantity  2 e f performance  laser pointer in near field on

     earth  is in vacuum far field   U * c / f  in direction moon.

     (separation electromagnetism and magnetism)


     "Voltage" in laser pointer = " battery voltage"  (+ E pot = U) 

     (- electrons of battery voltage are going to + battery voltage)


The moon has atoms and structures of crystal lattices on each wavelength  reflected magnetic flux from the earth under the condition, that the magnetic fluxes  not already reflected from the ionosphere.

("elektromagnetic short- waves" and earth-moon-earth- connections).


There is no photon h f which do work against gravity of earth

and lose frequency f by going to moon and getting the frequency back by reflection to earth. In vacuum is no waveresistance ~120 Pi  =  376,73 Ohm !


    Gravity between 2 atoms = Delta h f / Quantity e.= Delta U.

    The photon h f can't work against gravity. The Photon do not

     exist in vacuum.

     There is no "vacuum-energy", but the magnetic flux.

   

    Science textbooks worldwide need to be corrected :

    We can cut mass with laser and water in near field, but we can't cut mass with pho(t,n)ons and electromagnetic waves, which are  inside of the mass.

    120 years physicists have shot with  electrons on the slits of the double slit experiment, although from the electron gun only the magnetic flux V / f came out.

    Is the new extendet Ohms law now physics of common sense or not ?
    electromagnetism = velocity v in near field of "hot" atom
    magnetism            = velocity c in far field of "hot" atom
    gravitation             = Delta  h f / Quantity e between atoms
                                  = Delta U = Delta E pot.

    Electromagnetic field h f ² / R e = e f ²  is in near field of the  "hot" Hydrogen atom.  h f² / e f ² = h / e =  U / f is in far field of the "hot" Hydrogen atom.

    The Einstein approach was: m / 2 v² (+ working outlet) = h f
    Adjusted Einstein approach is: lambda / 2 * Re = hf in mass

    R Quantity e in copper = U/f or Vs in vacuum
    Lambda/2 = Quantity e f in copper
    Lambda/2 * f resonance = Quantity e f² in copper
    Lambda/2 is not property of light, but property of mass.
    Frequency is no property of light, but property of mass

    Spooky quantum is over.

    Therefore e = h f  / 4,135667662 * 10^ -15 V inside mass and has not with h f / c² = 9,109 383 * 10^-31 kg.
    Energy hf is not = m c².
    Energy h f / e = E pot.
    Energy m/2 v² = E kin

    There is neither the wave-particle-duality still the photon with
    energy hf. The Eimstein-photon in vacuum was in New extendet Ohm's Law to phonon in mass.
    Not time and space are linked, but time and mass:
    1 second = h / eV in mass.
    U = E pot in mass
    U / f = E pot / f in vacuum is the magnetic flux.

    So photons "with energy h f"  receive no mass. They do not exist inside or outside of a "Higgs-field" or in vacuum.

    The particle physicists at CERN must not prove that the

     Higgs field exist. They  must prove that  photons exist.


     The wonder of discovery of gravitational waves in 2016

     can not be given with  E= mc², but perhaps with

     vacuum wave resistance ~ 120 Pi = 376,73 Ohm ?

     Gravity is endothermic.

     Gravity waves are exothermic ??


     Magnetic flux U / f in vacuum is exothermic.


     Gravity flux f / U is endothermic in copper

     Electric flux = Quantity e f in copper

     Magnetic flux = R Quantity e in copper

     Electromagnetic flux = R Quantity  e ²  f ²

     in copper


     Gravity-flux in copper * electric flux in copper

     * magnetic flux  in copper = e f  in copper.


     Gravity waves are inside of copper, if frequency f from

      ( Quantity e f = Lambda/2) is changing.

     Gravity waves are music-modulations " On Air".


    Gravitational time dilation ?    

     U = E pot of a clock = h f / Quantity e.

     2 identical quartz watches on the ground of earth  and

     in a  satellite do not have a time difference, but a

     difference in frequency.


     Frequency in quarzwatch = U Quantity e / h  = U * f / U

     = U * Gravity-flux.= f in mass.

     Therefore is - with the "New extendet Ohm's law"-

     Delta f in 2 quartz watches = Gravity and no

     time-dilation. There are no photones or

     electromagnetic waves between satellite and earth-

     receiver.

     Between satellite and earth receiver is the magnetic

     flux U / f.


     The atomic clock in 20230 km from the Earth's center

      distance satellite is 14.81920218 Hz faster than the

      identical atomic clock on earth.


     And time ?

    Einstein's space-time does not exist. In mass

     with Planck constant h / U e is the time.

     Time in mass of satellit = 0,067480015 s faster.  

     than on earth.Time is not in vacuum-space.     


     We do not live in time, but time lives in us.

     ( Medicine-Prof. Dr. Hoimar von Dithfurt, 1972 in

      his book : In the beginning of the hydrogen was)

    

     In beginning of was lamba /2 of hydrogen-atom =

     e f and E pot = U, the electromagnic U e f in mass

     = performance = Watt.

     U e f in mass / e f² in mass = light U / f in vacuum.

    Re in mass = U/f in vacuum



        Question to particle physicists and relativists : What

     is a

     Thunderstorm?

    Delta f is gravitation between clouds. (experimentally

     secured, falling water droplets lose frequency)


     h f / Quantity e =  U = E pot of one cloud.

    U Quantity e f = flash in atmosphere between

     2 clouds or earth and one cloud ( U-Difference)

     U/f = light  of flash. ( Kelvin-Generator)

    Quantity e f * f of resonance = thunder in thunderstorm


    What please, is there wrong ?

        The question is not answered by physicists since 3

     years. University professors refuse to

     communicate.

     Is it true, that the "New  extended Ohm's law" was

     hushed up in the last years? Why??


    Albert Einstein contradicts himself in Twin

    paradox and clock paradox. The man on the earth is

    not aging faster than his twin brother in space.


    NASA can with Scott Kelly, who was 1 year (til    
    February 2016) in the ISS, check this  with his twin

    brother Mark, who was on earth.

    Reported only that Scott Kelly has grown in the ISS to

    2 inches in one year.


    Potential energy U in ISS is higher than Potential  

    energy U on earth.

    Why is it not reported, that Einstein wrong has?


    A quartz watch on the steeple of Kirchhundem  

    ticking faster than the identical quartz watch on the

    ground. This is not the time, but at the

    various potential locations of the watches, in which

    crystal frequencies are different. (1962 this situation

    was reviewed, Stephen Hawking, Brief History of

    Time)

    Physicists say: How quickly time passes depends on 

    where and how fast we are. That is not correct.

    Fast or faster is only the frequency f in mass!!

    Why is hushing up???

    Underlay Scott Kelly with 2 inches more about a "time

    dilation" by higher potential frequency on ISS?

 

   What happens there?

 

filament                                   In lightbulb:

 

           R e         U / f               Light =

                                                 

R e U e ² f ² / f  h = U R e f / R = P

                                                                         P / 0,5 Lambda * f resonance =

                   R e              U / f                           U Quantity e f / Quantity e f²  = U / f

 

h / Lambda = h / 2 Quantity e f in mass  *

U / f in space = R e in mass

U in mass = potential energy = h f / Quantity e 

 

 

*Students and pupils are worlwide taught:
The momentum is h / Lambda in space,

h / Lambda = mass * c 

 

Right is : h / Lambda = h / 2 Quantity e f in mass

U / f * R e = h * = Joule * R / f in mass !!

In space = the magnetic Flux U / f. 

 

A physical picture of the world is broken together.

Spooky quantum is over.

R = U Quantity e f / Quantity e² f ² in mass

   = Performance / electric flux² in mass

In vacuum is no R with ~120 Pi.

H, "the magnetic field-strength", is not A/m in space, but 2 Quantity e f / Lambda in mass.

S = V/m * A/m is not = Watt / m² in vacuum.


Momentum is not h / Lambda in space but

Volt / Lambda * U / f  = U² / c in mass.

E is not = mc². There are no photones.


U / 0,5 Lambda * gravity flux f / U = 1 / e in mass

U / 0,5 Lambda * electric flux e / R  = e in mass

U e f = electromagnetic flux in mass ( atmosphere, arc)

U e * f resonance = flash in space ( Thunderstorm)

U / f = light is perpendicular to the electromagnetic flux

Lambda / f = Quantity e in mass

h / 2 Quantity e  = U Quantity e f / c = P (ower)  / c in mass


Geiger Counter: U / f space * Quantity e f² gas atoms = U Quantity e f gas atoms = P (ower) in gas atoms. In Geiger Counter is thunderstorm by magnetic flux.

Gas atoms have potential energy U.

U atom = h f / Quantity e

P atom = h f ² / Quantity e


Go back to the experiment of 2009.

A 10-meter long horizontal dipole in the middle has an impedance of 50 ohms and a resonant frequency of 14,250 MHz when in 10 meters height is suspended above the ground. Resonant frequency and impedance increase with height E pot = from U atom =

h f / Quantity e. Frequency f in "half-wave-dipol" is changing with h / Quantity e² = R of dipol.

3 Meters over ground the dipol has only 13,950 MHz resonance.


Half wave dipol ( ham radio operator) against LHC at CERN. The winner is the half wave dipol. 


Vortex tube refrigeration system animation on You tube :

The new answer with the new extendet Ohm's Law :


R Quantity e * Quantity e f * f resonance (silencer)

= U Quantity e f = (P)ower on the warm side of the Vortex tube.


Pneumatic pulse U² / c in tube-mass * Lambda / U in tube-mass = U / f, the cold magnetic flux on the cold side with  R Quantity e in the tubemass or U / f in space.


U / f in space = R e in mass is cold ( magnetic)

R e² f² = P in mass is hot ( electromagnetic)

e f = 1/2 Lamba in mass is electric

Electric Half wave dipole of ham radio operators

= 1/2 Lambda minus velocity- factor.

A 10 meter long wire, in 10 meters hight has the frequency of resonance with 14,250 MHz.


299792458 m / s : 14 250 000 Hz * 1/2 dipol = 10,51 meter length. There is no velocity c in the mass of dipole, with R e, but in vacuum with U / f.

R Quantity e in mass = 285 000 000 m/s : 14 250 000 Hz * 1/2 dipol = 10 meter length of half wave dipole.


Momentum in mass of dipole is :

U / f input from vacuum  * U / Lambda in mass of dipole

( U in mass = h f / quantity e = potential energy  of the dipole ) = U² / c in mass of dipole.


Poyntingvector S  = V/m * A/m = Watt /m² in vacuum is nonsence.

Einsteins m/2 v² + WA = h f is nonsence. The weight of the electron mass R quantity e in the dipole or in Vortex tube is not dependent on the speed.

Take a 10 meter long Windom-Antenna. The 500 Ohm-point h / Quantity e² for the one wire feed is 3,6 meter far from the end of the antenna. The antenna  for cold output U / f looks like a Vortex tube.

Heinrich Hertz has from Maxwell predicted "electromagnetic waves" never demonstrated.

In the last 130 years has been much fudged in physics.


The magnetic field lines U / f of a half-wave dipole are cold. They surround the electricity Quantity e * f  * f resonant of a dipole or the amperage * f resonance of Sun.

Ampere * resonance frequency has no light speed

Ampere = Quantity e f = Quantity Lambda/2.


Quantity Lambda / 2, the hydrogen atoms with electrons, remain on Sun.


The gravity flow f / U = Frequency / E pot on Sun can neither electrons nor escape atoms.
Sun is a black hole. Time is the cycle of matter in Sun system. Cold magnetic Solar radiation is black, until it encounters mass.


Lunar Laser Ranging

The momentum in the Apollo 11 reflector from the earth to the moon is not hf / c but
U² / c = R (Reflector on the moon) * U / f from Earth-antenna  = h / e ² quantity * h f / quantity  e f =
h / quantity e ² * h / quantity e in reflector.


The new signal back to earth from moonreflector

= U quantity e f / e f² = U / f.

The differenz between the two signals in 2,55 s Earth-time  in one Earth-antenne is minus 250 dB over 740 000 km.

The U/f distance between Sun and Pluto round trip

is 11,3 hours Earth time. Minus db = ??


Time and frequency are properties of mass no properties of vacuum. Time in vacuum between Earth and Mars in m/s  is changing, not constant. Time =

h / Ue in mass.


In July 2015, the NASA was with satellit "New Horizons" to 10 000 km near Pluto.

Parabol-Antenna of " New Horizons" has 42 dbi.

The transmission power is not known.

To calculate the path loss between satellite on Pluto   and antenna reception system on Earth, is  not need antenna gain in dBi compared with an isotropic radiator, but the ratio comparison db from the transmit power between vacuum- and earth antennas.


Nevertheless, an attempt:
The shortest distance Pluto earth = 4275 * 10 ^ 9 m
The parabolic mirror on New Horizons has 42 dbi.
The antennas on Earth have adopted 208 dbi, together

250 dbi.

Pluto sits in the middle of a glass sphere, on the surface  the earth is floating.
The formula: 4 Pi r². Distance Pluto / Earth is r.

Power of New Horizons in antenna is 200 Watts ?


200 Watts * adopted 250 dbi gain in one direction

____________________________                  


12,56 * ( 4,275  * 10 ^ 9 ) ²

=

 2,17 Zepto-Watts on Earth after the magnetic runtime

 U / f from Pluto in vacuum in 4 hours.

V/s  in Earthantenna  would be  2,17 *10 ^ - 22 Watt / 2 e  = 0,000677203 V * frequency.

U²/ c = R * h f / Lambda in Earthantenna


Extendet Ohms Law :

U²/ c * Lambda / U = h f² / Quantity e f ²

1/2 Lambda = e f = As * f = 1,602 * 10^ -19 A

Quantity e f = Quantity 1/2 Lambda.


Magnetic loop

Physicists, electrical engineers and also ham radio operators  call the "magnetic loop" as "magnetic antenna". The antenna, the indicator is a circular coppertube with a voltage-resistant capacitor is fed via a special inner loop. Now the experts think, in the condenser would be the electric field and the circular tube has the magnetic field with Quantity Ampere.


That (Wikipedia) is not right:

magnetic field is on air, with U / f ,

The circular tube has U Quantity e f / Quantity e f² in

mass = U² / c * Lambda / U in mass = U / f output.

The impedance of magnetic loop with  h / quantity e²

is less than 1 Ohm.

There is no magnetic antennas, there is only the magnetic flux in space.

Antennas are electric or electromagnetic, not magnetic.


Other relationships

U R e / 2 Lambda = U² / c in mass

e in mass =  U / R f = h f / U

e is not in vacuum in the solar wind.

In vacuum is only the magnetic flux U / f.


e is not free in space or vacuum.

h = Power h f ² / f ², not energy * time, but potential

energy * time  with  h f / e = U.

f ² = U² e² / h ² in mass.

X-ray tube:
Anode: Quantity h f² (Watts / cm²) : electric flux * Resonance = Quantity e f² = U / f radiation.
U / f is perpendicular to the short circuit by resonance between the anode and cathode of X-ray tube.

School Physics :

Intensity of X-ray-tube = Coulomb / kg.

That's  wrong.

Right is : U / f * quantity e f² body = U quantity e f  / cm² body = watts / cm² body.

Have you ever had a sunburn?

Electromagnetic radiation and thus particle exists only in

mass = solids, liquid bodies and gases, not in a vacuum.

Vacuum with mass e would be no vacuum.


1 Sievert = 1 Joule / kg  = 1 m² * frequency ².

f ² = U² Quantity e² / h² in mass.

1 m² / s² = 1 m ² * f ².

The unit is very important for the health of the world population.

New Advanced Ohm's law against sunburn:
U / Quantity e = R * f in skin.
U / f Sun * Quantity e f² skin = Power in skin.

Time in mass = sunshine U/f = Vs.
Sunshine in Berlin is 1800 hours per year.
Sunshine U / f * 1800 hours quantity e * f ² * 1 m² solar panel = 120 KW Performance year.


There is no ionizing radiation with the photons of

Einstein's School Physics or with Maxwells "electromagnetic waves" or the simultaneous occurrence probability of particles to
various locations. Cosmic rays = U / f.


In vacuum is no photon with "energy hf" and no

R with 376,7303135 Ohm.

R is in mass with h / Quantity e² = U / Quantity e f =

U / Quantity 0,5 Lamba.

A light bulb consumes U Quantity e = Joule  to the filament through the resonance to produce U Quantity

e f. U e f / e f² in filament is U/f = light.


There are only magnetic radiation U/f in vacuum and no ionizing radiation, which is explained by the school physics as a jet of high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves in vacuum.

Frequency and time are properties of mass. In oscillating circle is mass R C L between voltage,

timer is RC.

R C L is the electric half wave dipole U e f  in resonance, transistor-generated. Hydrogen-atom e f with possible f resonance is a half-wave dipole. U / f in space * e f² hydrogen-atom = electromagnetic U e f = possible short circuit in the condenser. On possible e f  betwenn the plates is perpendicular U/f, like a spark plug in the car. U/f is perpendicular on burning plutonium

Mass burning PUO2 = U quantity e f = Watt. 

f resonance in mass of burning PUO2 = 

~ 4,836 * 10^14 Hz.

There is no wave-particle duality in vacuum.

In vacuum is U / 4,836 * 10^ 14 Hz.

U of burning PUO2 = h f / e,

e f ² in mass of burning plutonium PUO2 = Watt / Vs !

Vs = U/f is from sun or other emitters!!


plutonium is 240 times heavier than hydrogen.

H2 + O = Watt : 1,007 Quantity e f² = U / f exotherm.

PU + O2 = Watt : 242 Quantity e f² = U / f endotherm

H2 consumes O to make Watt in atmoshere.

A car consumes gasoline and makes Watt.

Watt = mass consume in joule  * f resonance = U e f or

h f² in mass.

Ampere = Quantity e f = Quantity Lambda/2 in mass.


Each plate of a capacitor in an AC circuit
can be understood as a half-wave dipole. The transistor circuit further above shows :
R C L = 0.5 lambda = Watts / R Quantity e f = e f².

Between the 2 plates of capacitors is U / f, not photons

h * f of school physics.


The phase-shifted AC on sun with Quantity e f * f res  and  Quantity e f * fres on earth  is = the magnetic flux

U / f between the Sun and Earth.

 

Light- or radio radiation does not belong to the "ionizing radiation" as short-wave UV rays, X-rays, cosmic rays and radioactive radiation. There is no "non-ionizing or ionizing radiation". There is only magnetic radiation

U / f exothermic or U/f endothermic.

 

When electric welding is necessary to protect against sunburn. It happens following:
U / f welding light mm² * time / Quantity 0.5 Lambda  in  skin = R * Quantity e mm² / mWatt  = 

R Quantity e  mm² / mWatt  in skin.

R quantity e in mass = U / f in space.

Is that now a "not ionizing", "a ionizing", or a "magnetic" Radiation?

 

With large Sun parabolic mirrors can be electrically welded. U / f is in the focal point. In the iron plate, which is held in the focal point, is Ampere * resonance frequency
In the  iron plate, a hole is created.

 

 

Between Sun and the "solar furnace" of the parabolic mirror there are no Photons with energy  h f or electromagnetic waves with A/m * V/m =

" Solar-Konstant 1367 Watt / m²" on 1 point. 

 

Solar furnace, Odeillo France, has magnetic flux

with U / f Sun in the focal point. The iron plate is electric. Iron plate and focal point together are electromagnetic  and have 1000 KW thermic energy.

 

1000 KW U quantity e f  ironplate / Quantity e f²  ironplate = U / f = light in space.

 

Extendet Ohms Law :

If Uranium-ores illuminated in the mine with UV light,
give light from:
UV-light = U / f = Vs in space.

 

U/f in space = R e in mass of Uranium-ores.

In Uranium-ores is Quantity e f² = Watt / Vs

U/f in space * Re * e f² = R * I² = Watt in Uranium-ores.

Watt / Quantity e f² = U/f , the cold magnetic flux between Sun and Earth or UV- lightsource and Uranium-ores.

 

Quantity e / h = f / U is the gravitational uranium.

Electron configuration hydrogen atom e / h = f / U =

1/ R e =2.417989249 * 10 ^ 14 Hz / U.

Uranium is * 92 = 2,224550109 * 10^16 Hz / U 

Uranium has 22,24 Peta Hz / U.

Hz / U = Ampere / Epot in mass. E pot is the distance

of one mass to second mass, so from Sun to Earth, or

Moon to Earth. Between Moon and Earth is U difference . U = E pot = h f / Quantity e.

 

1 KWh = 2,247 * 10 ^ 25 eV = W(ork)

1 KW  = 2,247 * 10 ^ 25 eV f = P(ower) = U Quantity e f.


The photosphere of the Sun has - with the transition from "hot Sun-Watt in the Sun with Millions of

K(elvin)"  to the cold magnetic flux U / f -  5700 K.

Science could not explain this difference in temperature.

 

The solar corona can be observed in eclipse without eye protection. On electric corona is perpendicular the magnetic flux U/f. In corona = U Quantity e f  and

R quantity e. Strength of U Quantity e f = Strength of

U / f.


The assumption, that the electric Sun-corona is hotter than the electric Sun's surface, is therefore physically wrong. Sun is an electromagnetic location.


According to the author ought the magnetic radiation from a radiant shortwave antenna, 10 meters long, stretched horizontally, be visible when the antenna is in an inversion boundary layer, 10 meters over ground.

 

The antenna is electromagnetic, the radiation is magnetic. In antenna is the electric flux Quantity

e * f * f  resonance. The magnetic flux is perpendicular on the electric flux Quantity e f².

Thunderbolt is between 2 clouds. U/f is perpendicular on thunderbolt.

 

Einstein's mistake:
h / lambda = mass * c
Correct is:
h / lambda in mass = eV / c in mass.

R Quantity e² f² in mass = Quantity eV f in mass =

U Quantity e f = V * A in mass = P(ower) in mass. 

 

P in masse / Quantity e f² in mass =  U / f in space.

The field strength V/m is a DC product in capacitor.

 U / f is an AC product between 2 capacitorplates.

 

Gravitational flow

The frequency in capacitor is dependent on the distance between the 2 capacitor plates.
f / UQuantity  e / h is  the gravitational flow in one capacitor plate 

Frequency f = U e / h in mass

Potential energy = U  in 1 mass  = h f / quantity e .

 

Gravitational flow and Lambda/2

f / U * Quantity 0.5 Lambda = f / U * Quantity e f =

f / R = Quantity e² f / h in one capacitorplate.

U is potential energy in 1 plate. (Casimir-effect) 

f / R = A / Vs = Quantity e² f / h in mass.            

There is no "quantum flux" and "energy of vacuum". 

In vacuum is only U / f exotherm between masses.

Each mass has f / R = A/Vs = Quantity e f² / U.

U = E pot. 

 

Likely stay the frequency :
Watt / Quantity e f² in the short-circuit loop =

R Quantity e in transformer sheet.
Ampere / R Quantity e = f / R = magnetic attraction in transformer sheet.

We have magnetic flux U / f  in space and magnetic attraction in mass.

 

The British physicist John Henry Poynting (1842 -1914) was assumed that an electromagnetic field can thereby perform work when it is weaker.


That's nonsense, of course, if one looks at a light bulb. A light bulb consumes in their filament

U Quantity e to convert the electric field in an electromagnetic field. U Quantity e f = Watt.

U Quantity e f / Quantity e f² = U/f = light.

Light is not electromagnetic, but magnetic.

There are no electromagnetic photons.

 

The momentum

h / 1239,861 * 10 ^ - 9 Lambda = 1 eV/c =

1 eV / Lambda * f resonance in hydrogen atom as mechanical half-wave dipole. 

 

1239,861 * 10 ^ - 9 lambda belongs to Paschen series. 1 eV = excitation energy of a half wave dipole. Exitation energy = energy consumption.

 

 

There is no mass by eV / c², but by half-wave dipole Lambda/2.

 

Frequency of hydrogen atom = lambda / 2 =

1 eV / h = 2.417950595 * 10 ^ 14 Hz

 

Lambda = h/p is not = h / m v * root 1 - v²/c²

 

Albert Einstein's E = hf = mc²  and Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty relation are refuted.

 

Heat is not a form of energy. Heat = U Quantity e f in mass = energy consumption * resonant frequency = Watt. Ludwig Boltzmann was refuted.

There is no entropy!

 

100% input in the light bulb generates 100% local heat = quantity 0,5 Lambda * U = Watt = Power.
Power / Quantity e f² = U / f = light = cold magnetic flux exotherm from hot f
ilament.


Quantity 0,5 Lambda = Quantity e f in an atom.
Quantity e f² = Ampere * resonant frequency.

 

The extension of the irrefutable formula

h / 1.239861 * 10 ^ - 6 Lambda = 1 eV / c

with additional speed of light c,
about h / 1.239861 * 10 ^ - 6 lambda * c = 1 eV / c ²

mass,

shows the mathematical absurdity of enlargement.

 

Quantity h = R Quantity e²  in mass, or

is  quantity e² * R = vacuum-impedance  in vacuum?

Heinrich Hertz did not write 120 Pi in vacuum
having seen.
 

 

Mathematics is one of the best methods  to lead by the nose himself (Albert Einstein)

 

In 1951, he admitted in a letter to his friend Michele Besso  not to know what light quanta are.

 

61 years later Higgs Boson is since July  2012 

 

                     125,36 GeV / c ² = mass

 

In mass and = mass, that is here the question.

What is in vacuum and not in proton?

Quantity e * V * resonant frequency  = R Quantity e² f ²

= Power = Watt in mass.

1 eV / c = h / 1.239861 * 10 ^ - 6 Lambda is basis of lattice vibrations in a crystal  (phonon). 

 

In the vacuum is only V / f, no electromagnetic waves.

V / f = magnetic flux  is not in proton, not in an atom but exotherm  in vacuum.

In an atom is Quantity e U / R = h f Quantity e² / h 

= Quantity e² f endotherm.

 

Be a non-called-meaning C4 professor of a german University  has given up the refutation of this formula.

He said: "You and I are small people, to change certain things !!" 

 

125,36 GeV / c² = mass is therefore Higgs-Boson nonsens.

Question to the established physics:
Theoretical isotropic point as radiator: Where is the frequency of resonance??

 

The classical electrodynamics emerges as physical flop.

Maxwell:

Electrical field constant * Magnetic field constant =

Energy * time h / 1.239861 * 10 ^ -6 Lamba * 1 e * 1 V * c =

Nonsens ² = 1 / c² = 1 s² / m² !

 

1 / c² = Vs / Lambda ( = 2 e f) * U  * c = Vs / Watt * c

1 / c  = Vs / Lambda * U = Vs / Watt =

magnetic light-Output from the glowing filament of a bulb.

 

U Quantity e f / e Quantity  f² of a half wave dipole (mass) = Vs in vacuum. Vs in vacuum =

R Quantity e in a half wave Dipole.

 

Frequency in an atom = isotropic half wave dipole =

0,5 Lambda / Quantity e =  Quantity eV / h  in mass

 

Higgs-Boson with GeV/ can not.

1 / c² = (V)s / (U) e f  * c = s² / m² !

U / U  c  =  Vs / Watt is light of a bulb.

Quantity eV / h in mass = frequency in mass

1 eV / c ² = h / 1.239861 * 10 ^ - 6 Lambda * c =

1 eV / c = h / 1.239861 * 10 ^ - 6 Lambda = mass??

 

No, Lambda, the dipole, is mass!

 

2 halfwavedipoles have together  2 eV, 2 h and each a mechanically length of 6,199305 *10^-7 lambda.

There are not much differences in the transmission properties between a lambda / 2 and a lambda dipole in macrocosm.

Microcosm and macrocosm are united.

Consequence: c = lambda / 2 mechanically * f =

Quantity e f * f resonance  in mass.

 

Each radio amateur so generates the speed of light.

The representatives of part science physics are shocked: There is no momentum eV / Lambda * f

in vacuum.

0,5 Lambda / f = Quantity e.

Quantity eV = U * 0.5 Lambda / f = R e² f in mass.

U/f  vacuum * 0,5 Lambda mass = eV in mass.

U/f vacuum * 0,5 lambda mass * f resonance = Watt

in mass.

Watt = electromagnetic in mass, 0,5 lamba = electric mass and U/f in vacuum = magnetic flux = Vs. 

0,5 Lambda is in the electric half wave Dipole = mass.

 

Higgs-Boson 212,36 GeV / c²  = mass??

The particle model of physics has failed on 4.07.2012

(LHC of CERN).

James C. Maxwell ( Poyntingvector), Albert Einstein

(E = mc²)  and Werner Heisenberg (uncertainty principle) are refuted.

 

(More literature: "The Higgs-Fake", Physicist Dr. Alexander Unzicker)

 

Watt / speed of light = energy / lambda in the mass of half-wave Dipole.

 

A piece of steel of 1000 mm length of an air forging hammer in 2 seconds 5 times hit. The temperature difference of  steel is up to 100 Kelvin.
Physicists calculate the coefficient of expansion of the increase in length of Steel with 1.15 mm.

  

Physicists calculate an increasing frequency at an
increasing wavelength of the steel !!

 

 

Special menu for relativists.
Lambda / 2 * U = Power in half-wave dipole
m / 2 v² bullet = Power in the target
Lambda / 2 = Quantity e f in iron atom = wavelength
U = h f / Quantity e = potential energy of an atom.

 

E = hf is not = mc²

H2 + O is not H2O + energy

H2 + O is H2O + power

Gravity

The contradiction that a railway track extended by sunlight and thus wavelength and frequency in the metal rise, dissolves the endothermic gravity in  the iron Atom.

Quantity e f / U quantity e  = 0,5 lamda / energy of iron atom = f / U.

 

U / f from sun * Quantity e f ² railway track =

U Quantity e f  = Power in railway track.

 

Frequency f = U Quantity e / h in mass

U = h f / Quantity e in an atom = E pot.

In mass of hydrogen atom is

e = h f / Epot and time in mass = h / U e.

 

 

No physicist can refute the following:


(Power) U Quantity e f in (railway track) * f / U (gravity in railway track) =

amps * resonant frequency =

Quantity e f² in railway track. 

 

 

U / f from sun * Quantity e f ² in railway track =

U Quantity e f  = Power in railway track.

 

Vs in vacuum = h f / Quantity e f  in a half-wave dipole. Vs = U / f

 

Charles Coulomb used the torsion balance in 1784 for electric charges and Cavendish used them to determine the gravitational constant.

Gravity = f / U = f / Epot in a plumb !

 

E pot = m g high = Gravitational mass gravity height above the ground = U Quantity e / h = changing frequency in mass. Frequency is the reciprocal of the time. (Clock paradox).

The resonance frequency of a half wave dipole is changing in different heights over ground.

 

Gravity in a dipole = f / U

U = E pot in the mass of dipole.

 

Take a 10 meters long dipole and you get in 3 meters

( horizontal high) over ground a resonant frequency of

13.950 MHz and in 10 meters high a resonant frequency of 14.250 MHz.

 

The old definitions:
Energy is the ability of an object to do work.

  Power is the energy change of an object per unit of time


New definitions for m / 2, energy and power :
0.5 mass = half wave dipole
energy    = watt / resonant frequency f in the half-wave dipole ( U quantity e , hf )
power     = energy * resonance frequency f in the half-wave dipole ( U quantity e f, h f²)

 

Gallium nitride in an LED coated with other phosphors = Ampere * resonant frequenzy = Quantity e f².

 

Quantity e f² = U quantity e f LED * Gravity f / U in   LED. ( endotherm)


Magnetic flux  exotherm of LED =

U Quantity e f / quantity e f² = U / f = light of the LED.

 

Luminous powder revolutionized the LED.

(WP Oct 1. 2016) The inorganic chemistry has understood.

 

Luminous powder has wavelength Lambda /2  and

f resonant = Quantity e f² , not the magnetic flux.

 

U/f = light is exotherm from powder.

 

Between 2 LEDs music can be transmitted wirelessly.


10 years ago
,

I asked relativists finally explain how they want to achieve with photons of electromagnetic energy hf.


The question is ignored by particle physicists  for 10  years.

With V / f, the declaration is not a problem.

 

In the early days of wireless telegraphy the "Fritter or coherer" responded by agglomeration of the nickel-iron- metal powder mixture on the magnetic flux V / f in space. 

 

The induction coil of Heinrich Hertz generated by
its magnetic flux V / f (in vacuum)  antennas and resonant circuits high-frequency oscillations in mass!


Claiming Heinrich Hertz had demonstrated the predicted Maxwell electromagnetic waves experimentally in space , is one of the largest forgeries in the history of physics.

After the first coherer 1884 wrote Heinrich Hertz 1888 over waves with electric ( not electromagnetic) power.

 

In Eduard Branly's coherer (1890) was the electric flux 

Quantity e f = Ampere  * f resonance = e f².

 

In space was U/f = R Quantity e in coherer-powder.

R quantity e * e f² = h f² = Watt in metallic coherer powder. There is  high-frequency oscillations in mass!

R quantity e  is changing in metallic coherer powder by U / f in space.

 

 h / 1,239861 * 10 ^ - 6 Lambda = 1 eV/c in mass. 

 

Therefore : 1 eV / c = h / Lambda in mass

1 eV / c  = mass  c is bullshit .

 

Frequency / U = gravitation in the atom =

 

lambda / 2 Pi f P (over) in the atom.


Distance

 

in lambda (meters) from the radiating point-atom has the magnetic flux strength U / f with angular frequency * Pover * time / wavelength * f resonant =

2 Pi f P s/ Lambda f resonant in the atom =

2 Pi P / c in the atom =

6,28 * Watt / Lambda.

 

Transmitting Lambda/2 dipole with 10 Watts, frequency 3,5 MHz, wavelength

85 m.

In 425 Meters distance , 90° from transmitting dipole, U/f * e f² in the second half-wave dipole is :

 

6,28 * 10 Watt / 5 * 85 m = 62,8 Watt / 425 m = 0,14 Watt / Lambda.

U/f in space on this point =

0,14 Watt / quantity e f² of the second dipole.


Near field of antenna is P = Watt in antenna.

 

look at there :

(https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahfeld_und_Fernfeld_(Antennen)

 

 

There are no electromagnetic waves or photons in vacuum.

 

 

h f / quantity e = U in mass !

h   / quantity e in mass  = Vs in vacuum !

R quantity e in mass = Vs = U/f in vacuum!

h / quantity e² in mass = R in mass!

 

 

Economy has understood:
Glare-free headlamps with LEDs over the formula h f² / quantity e f² = U / f in space come in the next years. ( WP 8.10.2016)

 

Physical Nonsense ³ =

The mass m, the velocity c, the energy W = hf, and the momentum p = mc can be assigned to each light Quantum and

m/2 v² = U e.

 

Right is :

Lambda / 2 * U =

U quantity ef = Watt  in a half wave dipole.

2 eV / Lambda in mass = Vs = U/f  in vacuum.

Lambda/ 2 = (quantity) e f.

There are no light Quantums but U/f in vacuum.

 

Picture 2 a

 

 

Watt in LED = kg m² f resonant / s² = h f ² in LED

Watt * s in LED = kg m² f resonant / s = h f  in LED

h f =  energy in LED * f resonant = h f² = Watt in LED

R = h / quantity e² in LED is changing by music- modulation. 

R in coherer or fritter changed by  U/f in space.

 

There are no photons or the resistance with 120 PiOhms or " electromagnetic waves" in vacuum. In space is only the magnetic flux U/f.

 

Energy  = hf is not = mc².

 

There is no immediate information exchange (without delay) between  "Twin Photons", but the exchange of information between atoms or Twin-LEDs on the exothermic magnetic flux V/f and the endothermic gravity in the nuclear f / U = Quantity e f / U Quantity e =

0,5 Lambda LED / energy LED.


E pot of the atom or LED  = U

 

Between 2 Twin-Leds of red colour is "music-information" = U/f with velocy c.

 

Picture 3 b

 

 

Since July 4, 2016, the NASA probe Juno has been taking over Orbit of Jupiter no electromagnetic waves or photons, but magnetic fluxes U / f from Jupiter. The prepared levels can be monitored on the Internet. 

 

Coils of Picture  3 b are half wave dipoles as open resonant circuits.  Every swinging half wave-dipole has 

P(over) or? 

Is the polarisation  of 1. dipole vertical and the polarisation of 2. dipole horizontal, is no information possible between the two dipoles.

 

With a vertical dipole of 5,50 meters length on the left Rhineside and a horizontal dipole of 5,50 meters

length on the other side is no communication  possible.

( free 11 meters citizens-Band)

Spooky Quantum is over. 

 

When are physics textbooks corrected?  

 

Not the funds are available to the author of this material collection according to the formula

Quantity e f ² / U Quantity e f mass 1 *

Quanity e f ² / U Quanttity e f mass 2

to investigate the gravity in distance  between two masses = Delta f / U or Delta U = h f / Quantity e between 2 masses.

Delta U between 2 masses = Delta Epot.

The European-Russian MARS probe Is on Oct. 21. 2016 crashed.

 

 Something is wrong with gravity calculations! ?

Frequency in mass = eV / h =

 

                      h / kg of mass * Lambda ².

 

 

Kg glas mass * f = h / Lambda² in glas mass 

Kg  prism  = h / c f in prism

 

mass is not = h f / c²

 

In vacuum is no frequency from Photon h f and no

wave-resistance of 376,73 PiOhms.

 

 

Occam's razor

 

kg c² = h f in mass.

kg f c in mass = U/f in space.

Gravity between 2 atoms = Delta h f / Quantity e =

Delta U = Delta Epot.

 

Hydrogen has a different potential energy than uranium.
U in atom = kg c² / quantity e in atom.

 

h = Joule * s  in mass

kg c² = Joule in mass

 

Time in atom = h / kg * c² = h / U Quantity e 

There is no space.

U/f in space = kg c² / Quantity e f in mass .

 

The magnetic flux

U/f in space = kg c² / amps in mass =

h f / Quantity e f  in mass.

 

You know Bell's inequality?

 

In space is no electromagnetic flux. Atoms are electromagnetic.

"Electrons" of an arc are  electromagnetic.

 

With respect to the half-wave dipole as atom :

0,5 Kg c² f = h f ² = P(over)  in mass

0,5 Kg c²   = h f   = Watt * s = Joule in mass

0,5 Kg Lambda * c = h in a half wave dipole mass

0,5 kg Lambda c / Quantity e in mass = h / Quantity e in

mass =

                               U/f in space =

                               h f / Quantity e f in mass

 

 

h / 1,239861 * 10 ^ - 6 Lambda in mass  = 

1 eV/c in mass. 

1 eV / c  = mass  c is bullshit .

                  

What do you think now about dark matter, dark energy , spooky quantum  and the physical fairy tale, Heinrich Hertz had proved Maxwell's predicted electromagnetic waves in a vacuum?

 

Why are no electromagnetic waves or Photons in

vacuum ?

Electromagnetic Watts in the half wave dipole (h f ²) generate by the time varying electric current amp * resonant frequency (quantity e f ²) the magnetic flux

(h / quantity e) in the half wave dipole.
(h / quantity e) in the half wave dipole =.
U / f in vacuum.

1 eV / c² in mass =

h / 1,239868 * 10 ^- 6  Lambda c in mass

is not = 1,783 * 10 ^ - 36 kg c. ( Wikipedia)

 

Energy = hf is not = mc²

 

Higgs-Boson at LHC CERN with 125,36 GeV/ c²

or around 225 * 10^- 25 kg is bullshit.

 

 

2,227948011 * 10^- 25 kg / 1,125 * 10^- 6 Lambda in mass = 5,049489 * 10 ^18 Hz in mass = 5.05 Exa-Hz in mass. 

 

Frequency is property of mass and not - with Photon-energy hf - property of a vacuum. 

 

The particle model of physics has failed.

Gravity = Delta U between atoms = Delta f / U.

e = hf / U in mass.

The indeterminacy of quantum mechanics in the measurement of e is nonsense³.

 

In an arc between masses are atoms.

Light is the magnetic flux  U/f, perpendicular to the arc

or the electromagnetic Watt- half wave-dipole. 

 

Spooky Quantum is over. 

 

The heat capacity of an atom =

h / frequency * gramm * K (elvin).

Mercury in makrokosmo = 0.125.

U / f in vacuum  = h / Quantity e in mercury 

h / Quantity e * e f ²  in mercury is power in mercury.

 

 

The formulas were derived from the experiment with a 10-meter-long horizontal half-wave dipole at various heights.
Two differently polarized half-wave dipoles are the proof, that there are neither Einstein's light quanta nor Maxwell's predicted electromagnetic waves.

 

Mass is not (with Einstein)=

energy / speed of light to the square

but (new)

h / frequency * heat capacity * Kelvin

 

Kelvin in mass = f * heat capacity / h

Delta f / U between 2 atoms = gravity

 

0.38 g copper antenna * frequency / time =

watts / Kelvin in antenna.

An imaginary isotropic radiator has no frequency. Therefore, there is no electromagnetic radiation in space.

Electromagnetic Sun with all frequencies and property

quantity e f ²  is a magnetic radiator. with exotherm output U/f  and endotherm gravity f / U.

Watts SUN / quantity e f ² SUN = U / f in vacuum.

 

Earth :

1 calorie * frequency resonant  in hydrogen = 14.3  watts  = U Quantity e f in hydrogen.

U / f from SUN * Quantity e f ²  seawater on Earth  = watts in seawater of Earth.

 

Hydrogen is mass, not the Higgsboson with

125,36 GeV / c² in July 2012 at LHC of CERN.

 

"Higgsboson" = U/f in vacuum =

h / Quantity e in mass.    

Global warming is also attributable to V/f, the magnetic flux from SUN.

Physicists at LHC CERN are warming up the Earth

also with U / f output and GWatts * s input.

LHC at CERN is a little sun on Earth.

On Earth :

9,807 Joule * f resonant in mass =

6,121 * 10^19 eV * f  resonant in mass = (P) over.

1 kp m / s = 9,807 watts in mass.

1 kp m = 9,807 Joule in mass

Mass is not = Joule / c².

 

1 eV / c² in mass =

h / 1,239868 * 10 ^- 6  Lambda * c in mass

 

Gramms in mass * Kelvin * f resonant =

watts in mass and not

with Poyntingvector  in Maxwell electromagnetic equitations A/m * V/m = watts / m² in a vacuum.

In a vacuum is the magnetic flux U/f = h / quantity e

in mass.

 

Magnetic Lumen in space  of a LED = 

Volt / Frequency =

P(ower) of  LED / 0,15 amps * resonant  frequency.

 

Watt in mass / quantity ef² in mass = Vs.

6,66666667 magnetic Lumen in space  * 0,15 Ampere * f resonant in mass = 1 Watt in mass.

1 Watt in mass = 22 LED's with 50 Volt and 0,02 A.

 

That means:

1 Watt in red LEDs =

4,83536 * 10^14 Hz * 1380658 * 10^- 20 constant L.Boltzmann in LEDs = 6,677597 Lumen in mass.

 

Ludwig Boltzman constant with

1,380658 * 10 ^-23 J / K is -together with Hz- in mass wrong. Frequency is property of mass, not

of Photons, wich get mass by Higgsbosons...........,,.

 

 

There are no photons or electromagnetic waves in vacuum. E = hf is not = mc². There is no wave-particle dualism.

 

 

Distance SUN- EARTH :

1kp * m * 1,020 * 10^11 Hz  / 6,677597

Lumen * s =  1.000314 GWatt / 6,677597 Lumen * s =

149 801 493 000 meters / Lumensecond. 

1 kp * m = 9,807 Joule.

 

1 Watt / 6,677597 Lumen = 0,14975447 Watt / Lumen

in LEDs. Light U/f of a LED  = Watt / Quantity e f².


Antennas of WIFI are electromagnetic U quantity e f - antennas, wich allows electronic devices to contact a wireless LAN over the magnetic flux U / f.

SUN is a WIFI-Antenna, the solarcell an electronic device with  amps * f resonant.

 

Magnetic U/f in space * electric Quantity e f² in solarcell = U Quantity e f = Watts in solarcell.

 

U/f in picture  2a = WLAN on lightfrequencies.

Red LED = WIFI-Antenna. Second red LED = electronic device. 2 LEDs can communicate, not

2 Photons.

 

Max Planck with his doubts about his own formula

E = hf  in 1900 was right.

The new formula today : E = hf in mass = a Phonon.

The Phonon in Hydrogen H 2  with 2 eV =

4,835904315 * 10 ^ 14 Hz * h is red-orange.   

 

Red -orange LED, Input 2,25 Volts,  

0,02 amps, resonant frequency 

4,835904315 * 10 ^ 14 Hz has

the magnetic Outputflux with

2.25 V * 0,02 amps / 0,02 amps * 4,835194301 * 10^14

f res in LED  = 4,653380733 * 10 ^-15 Vs in a vacuum.

Vs = U/f in vacuum =

h /quantity e or R * quantity e in a LED. 

A LED is an electromagnetic dipole on light frequency 

with magnetic Output.

 

You can hear the magnetic solar radiation with a 2 meter directional antenna and an SSB Receiver. (noise)

You can hear the noise on all frequencies in mass.

Frequency is property of mass, not of " electromagnetic Waves or Photons" in a vacuum. 

 

 

But Max Planck and the Radio Amateur  are simply not capable of assessing physical Basics argues the established physics, because they can not disprove the new formulas : 

 

Nonsence  of established Physics :

 

1240 nm eV / Wp as the wavelength of the emitted  light, as the established physics describes, is absolute nonsense
Wp = Lambda.

 

Right is :

1,601972439 * 10 ^-15 eV / c  = 

h / 1,240 * 10 ^ -10 Lambda in mass.

Phonon = Watts / amps * f (resonant) in mass = 

U / f , the magnetic flux in vacuum.

 

 

Phonon = Boson ??

In mass is frequency  = eV / h =  speed / Lambda !

Frequency is not in a vacuum and in light.

Light has speed c.

 

The mechanical half-wave dipole has therefore a shortening factor of 5 % on Short-Wave.

Knowledge is one of the audit questions for the broadcast authorization for amateur radio frequencies.

 

According to the previous physical definition, P(ower) is the energy conversion per time span. The new definition is:
P (ower) is = U Quantity e * frequency resonant or =

h f ² in mass. 

 

 

In Physics  p = pulse.

h / Lambda = pulse

h / Lambda * c is no mass = kg

 

Proof :

 

Higgsboson :

1.2536 * 10 ^ 11 eV  / c 2  =
h / 1,0109 *10^-17  Lambda  * in mass

 

Time and frequency are properties of  mass. Uranium 238 fulfilled in lead 206.

 

Einstein,Bohr, de Broglie, Compton, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Bell and Alain Aspect are refuted. 

 

Not "Photons" communicate, but masses over the magnetic flux U/f. " Photons" are Phonons in mass.

Gravity = Delta f / U between 2 masses.

Every mass has U with h f / quantity e.

 

 Look at Pictures 2a and 3 b 

 

Higgs-Boson is not = mass

eV / c² = pulse / c in mass

Pulse / c in water = Watts in water.

 

Higgsboson is the intern energy in mass with

I = Quantity e f = Quantity  Lambda/2 in mass.

f = Quantity eV / h  in mass

U = h f / Quantity e in mass

R = h / Quantity e²  in mass

Watts = R Quantity e² f² in mass

U / c = 2 R Quantity e / Lambda in mass

 

Watts / Quantity e f² in mass = U/f, the magnetic flux in vacuum.

OPERA-Experiment : Neutrino = U/f

Polarlights : U/f from SUN and particles of atmosphere EARTH.

U/f  SUN * ef² particle EARTH = Watts in particle.

Watts in particle / e f² particle = U / f polarlight.

Cosmic radiation = U/f. 

 

The reason, that the established physics for 120 years was offside the reality, is  the wrong understanding of the heat.

 

Heat was 120 years long energy.
This is wrong.

 

If you are holding a red-hot iron-piece in water, it hisses.
The heat U * quantity e = Joule  goes over a difference in temperature with resonant frequency in water. That is  U quantity e f = Watts in mass.

In vacuum, with Poiyntingvector in Maxwell equitations ,  are no fieldstrengthes  with  A/m * V/m = Watt / m² and therefore wether 376,73 PiOhms nor Photons.

 

The Federal Office for Radiation Protection in Germany considers the SAR value below 0.6 watts / kg of a handy to be particularly low radiation.

But 0,6 watts /kg is real not right.

 

The radiation is 0,6 watts / Quantity e f² = U / f.

The body has kg in mass with Quantity e f² in mass.

U/f from Handy * Quantity e f² body = watts in body.

 

U/f , the magnetic flux-  is heating up with R quantity e in body * e f ² in body = watts in body  only parts of the body. Body is only in little  parts resonant.

(Hydrogen-atoms of skin in sunshine)

Would that be different the mobile phone is no longer connected with his converter speaking from Europe to USA.

 

On the other hand, a cyclist provides cycling without a mobile phone in half an hour 2 watts / kg of body weight. The statement of the Federal Office for Radiation Protection in Germany is therefore  bullshit.

The established physics tells bullshit.

 

 

A growing number of physicists now understand:
The television receiver receives magnetic signals from the satellite, which can be  interfered with by electromagnetic influences (lightning, thunderstorms or ice between clouds).

 

The growing number of physicists  understand also :

The pulled apart steel spring in the
Karlsruhe physics Course ( KPK 2013)
has watts in their mass.

Watts = with the
New extendet Ohm's law
= R * quantity e ² f ² in the mass of the pulled apart  steel spring.

 

Remember :

0,5 Lambda * Quantity  e V / h in mass =

0,5 Lambda * f in mass =

a half-wave-dipole = a piece of wire = mass

 

A piece of wire is not with  eV / c² = mass in kg.

eV / c² = pulse / c = h / Lambda * c in wire. 

No physicist of the world can refute that.

1 Sievert is not  = 1J/ kg  or 1 m² / s² but

1 Sievert (Sv) / Lambda ² =  frequency² in mass

h * 1 Sievert / Lambda² = h f ² = Watts in mass.

 

U e f in mass = h f * Lambda / e = Watt in mass.


Time
in the quartz wristwatch = amps / lambda * f = lambda / c = amps / lambda * resonant frequency  in quarz- mass.

Irrefutable proof:
There are special wristwatches that are self-winding by the movement of the arm (change of U = Epot =

h f / Quantity e in the wristwatch by movement)

 

The following is incorrect from Einstein:Each mass corresponds to one energy and vice versa.Each mass change corresponds to an energy change and reversed


The following new research result is correct:
Each mass corresponds to a voltage and vice versa.
Each voltage change corresponds to a mass change and vice versa.


On the Moon, the identical quartz has a smaller wavelength and a higher frequency  than on Earth.

The quartz, 1 meter above the surface of the Moon, has U = Epot = h f / quantity e


Time is in heavy weight, not in the vacuum of space.

Einstein's connection of time and space is nonsense.

 

Vacuum is between masses. Between masses is the magnetic flux U/f and gravity Delta U.

U = h f / Quantity e = E pot.

There are no electrons in a vacuum. An arc in a vacuum = mass. The electrons in the arcmass are =

Quantity h f / U.

De Broglie wrote : Pulse = p = h / Lambda.

Right is : Pulse = p = h / Lambda in mass. 

                      Pulse = p = eV/c in mass

               eV / c in mass = h / Lambda in mass

               eV / c is not =  mass  c.

 

U Quantity e f / Quantity e f² in an atom =

U Quantity e / Lambda in an atom =

U / f, the magnetic flux, in vacuum.

Atoms have the electric flux lambda or lambda * f resonant, not the light U/f.

 

The 1. wrong approach of Albert Einstein:

Mass / 2 * velocity squared is h * f minus work out at the time.

   

The new right approach:

Lot of lambda/2 * R =  h f / Qty * e = voltage in the heavy mass of a halfwave dipole (Atom)

The corrected Einstein approach:

Mass/2 * velocity squared  =  h f / s  = Watt.

The arrow with the property m / 2 v² produces in the target U quantity e f = watts.

There is arrow and target =  2 masses.

 

Lot of Lambda * R / 2 f  in a halfwavedipole  =

U/f in vacuum.

U / f is perpendicular to the arc flash.

In arc flash are atoms and therefore electrons.

Electron = hf / U in mass of an Atom.

 

Heinrich Hertz experimented with light-arcs of

"electrical force" ( his own words).

Perpendicular to the arcs ( in vacuum) was standing the magnetic flux U / f and not Maxwell's predicted "electromagnetic waves" ( in vacuum)

Maxwells predicted electromagnetic waves are in Hertz dipole, in mass with U Quantity e f = Watts.

 

Qty = Quantity

Lot of Lambda/2 = Quantity e f  in mass

( hydrogen-atom = 1 e f ) =  amps in mass)

R = h / Quantity e² ( hydrogenatom = h / 1 e²)

h = Planck's constant in mass

f = frequency in mass

e = electron in mass

U/f = Vs in vacuum = h / Qty e or R Qty e in mass

Lambda/2  = e f = amps = wavelength in mass.

 

A physical picture of the world breaks down under the following mandatory equation:


Frequency square in mass = h / lambda square in mass = Watts / c square in mass.

 

U Quantity e f / h in a half wave dipole = f ² in a half wave dipole.

Frequency f is in mass and not with the "Photon-energy h f" or the pulse h f / c in a vacuum..

Frequency is property of mass, not of light U/f.

 

Power LED = Watts.
Frequency of the LED = power / h f.
Light of the LED = Watts / quantity e * f ² = V * s = U / f.
The LED resistance of a LED-atom  = h / quantity e square in the direction of flow.
Time of the LED system = h * f / power.
A LED is a half wave Dipole.

Gravity of a LED-atom  = U = Epot = h f / Quantity e..

Mass of a LED, time in the  LED-System   and a vacuum with a LED are not "relative", or?

 
The oscillator on the Moon resonates at the same frequency, as the oscillator  on Earth. The paralell resonant circles  have however both different wavelengths. There is, therefore, simultaneity in different masses. Time is in mass, not in space.

 

Proof :

eV / c² = h * s / Lambda ²  = R * s  / f ² in a half wave dipole. 

R * s / f ² in a half wave  dipole is not = m c² in space.

In vcuum is no time. Time is in mass.

"We do not live in the time, but the time is living in us."

( The doctor  Prof. Dr. Hoimar von Dithfurt, 1972)

The laughter of the physicists of that time is always  getting smaller.

 

 "Would be more individuals sincerely prescribe their science and their own thinking – I think that had us so many modern anomaly such as string theory or still larger particle accelerator saves."

Physicist  Dr. Alexander Unzicker. 

 

The Copenhagen interpretation rejected microscopic reality.
Today we know, in  microcosm is the "New Extended Ohm's Law"

 

Note:

Parallel to a load resistance has a Zener diode the breakdown voltage V/f.
The load resistance is an electromagnetic power source with U quantity e f.
U quantity e f load resistance / quantity e f ² load resistor is V/f Zener diode. The Zener rushes.

No electrons tunnel through the barrier of the Zener diode but the magnetic flux V / f.

SUN is the the load resistance. On Sun is quantity e f².

The vacuum between SUN and Earth is the Zener diode.

You think, this is  wrong? Then you must refute:

R quantity e in Zener diode = V/f in vacuum.
With a noise amplifier, you can hear the noise in the Z-Diode. Between Z-Diode and noise amplifier is a capacitor. In capacitor is U/f. 

 

Between SUN and Earth is U/f .

Between SUN and halfwave dipole = U/f.

 

 

Proof :

Attenuation for 3.5 MHz signals at midday and accessibility of all continents over the night distance of the earth for Radio Operaters.

 

U / f = Vs  in vacuum near Earth = R  Lambda / f in an atom on Sun.

R  Lambda in an atom = h f / Quantity e = U in an atom.

Quantity e = h f / Volt  in an atom.

 

f = U quantity e / h in atoms of Sun and atoms in Earth-antennas. Therefore is at midday the attenuation on 3,5 MHz. There is no Delta U.

 

Delta U between 2 atoms = gravity. 

 

How does lunch damping in the shortwave Propagation?


Magnetic Sun River in the nitrogen atom  on Earth =

h f / qty e * f.
Property of nitrogen atom on Earth  = h * f / qty e * f.


Bill for relativists, which sell physics as a religion:

h * f * h / e * f * e = R * h in Nitrogen Atom by SUN on Earth. In the night Nitrogen Atom = h / qty e.
On lunch is no magnetic flux V/f for 3,5 MHz more around the nitrogen atom.
The assertion X-ray radiation from the photosphere of the Sun would nitrogen oxide on Earth ionization, is therefore total physical nonsense.

A dogma of physics has disappeared in the vacuum:
Z = 376,73 PiOhms.
R, in the atom, =  h * f / qty e^2 * f.

That is physics and no Religion.

Proposal:

Volt * quantity e / V * s in an atom =

quantity * lambda / 2 =

quantity * e f =

h * f sq / U =

Watts / Volt in an atom.

The pulse 1 eV / c is not = m * c. E is not = m c².

1 eV / c = h / 1,239 * 10 ^ - 6 Lambda in an atom.

 

 

Polar lights:
h / quantity e m ² in the atoms of the atmosphere is V * s room / lambda squared in atoms.

Watts = h f² in Aurora atoms is h * c square / lambda square, or not? 

h f² / quantity e f² in  Aurora atoms  =

h / quantity e in atoms  = U/f in vacuum, what else?

U / f  * quantity e f² in our eyes =U quantity e f in our eyes.

Gravity in polar light atoms : 
Quantity e / h = f / U .
Energy U is potential energy.

 

Supplement:
R c / f square
in an atom = V * s in a vacuum.
Lambda/2 = U / R in an atom but not in light.

 

U Quantity e f  ( Watt) / c²  = 

h / Quantity e² f² = R / f²   in an atom.

 

R / f ²  * Quantity e f ² in an atom = h / Quantity e in an atom  = Vs = U / f in vacuum.

 

Light = U / f and not h f.

 

P h o n o n  h f  = R e² f in an atom,

                 Time =  h / R e² f  in an atom.

h f in an atom = U² / R f , what else?

h f ² in an atom of a bulb = U² / R, what else?

Quantity e / h = f / U is Gravity in an atom. 

 

 

Einstein's error :

E = hf is not = mc²

m/2 v² + WA is not = h f, but kinetic energy.

h f  in an atom  is potential energy.

 

Hydrogen-atom is a halfwave dipole with frequency

f = eV / h = 2 U * f / R * Lamda in the atom.

Quantity Lamba/2 = Quantity e f, what else?

 

h / e in hydrogen-atom = 4,13566 * 10 ^-15 Vs in vacuum, or not ? 

 

Who was first there, Einstein's space curvature or energy = mass, which follows the space curvature ?

Answer : In the vacuum is only V / f.

 

Back to Max Planck with the New extendet Ohm's

law and c² of Albert Einstein :

 

Energy = h f = R c² s / f² in the atom

Power in the atom = h f² = R c² s / f.

Atom with quantity e * f is a halfwave-dipole.

Quantity e f  = Quantity Lambda/2.

e f = Ampere = I.

h / 1 eV in hydrogen-atom = 4,13566 * 10 ^-15 s in hydrogen atom, or not ? 

In vacuum - without clock-  is no time.

Time and frequency  are  properties of mass.

 

299 792 458 m/s = 299 792 458 Lambda * 1 Hz, ok?

Has a lightsecond in vacuum with

299 792 458 Hz * 1 m (= Lambda in mass)  frequency??

 

 

CO2-split for chemists:


magnetic flux V/f from Sun
meets a cold cloud with
U / f + 3 H2O + 3 CO2
= 3 CH2O + O3 = snow or rain.
O3 (Ozon) is in upper atmosphere  10-20 km high.

On the other hand: With
3 CH2O + 2 O3 follows  3 H2O + 3 CO2 in a Cloud.

 

Energy-split for relativists:

U Quantity e = R Lambda² / f  = Epot  in an atom

m/2 v² = Ekin of  Atom.

 

                               

                                1

                          __________

 

                           2 pi root (LC)

 

in the resonant circuit of macrocosm  is  

                               =

U quantity e / h in the nuclear resonant circuit .

 

E = hf ist not = mc², frequency f is property of mass m (kg) and

 

P (ower) /c = h / quantity e in an atom of a half-wave-diple in macrocosm = U / f in vacuum.

 

 

c = Lambda * f  = Ampere * f resonant =

Quantity e f ² in a half-wave-dipole 

 

1/2 Q * U * f =  P = flash  in a capacitor.

 

U / f = magnetic light-flux   in vacuum =

P(ower) / c in mass

 

h f ² / c in a LED = U / f = light in space, or not?

E = mc² ?  Where is the potential energy of m?

 

English version of the german  thinking collection,  magneticquant.de  

The author is no doktor, no physicist,  but

a scientifically researching Radio operater with the

call-sign DK1XI. 

 

 

 

Ergänzungszusammenfassung

 

auf Grund der Debatte im deutschen Frageforum : Wer weiss was?

Internetfrage : Frage 2 zur Leuchtdiode.

 

Da wurde zunächst versucht die Tatsache unter den Teppich zu kehren, dass die Energie eines Photons von 2,55 eV rund 200 000 mal kleiner ist, als die Ruhemasse des Elektrons.

 

 

Denn diese physikalische Tatsache rüttelte  gewaltig an E = eV = mc² und der zur Zeit geltenden wissenschaftlichen Definition  eines Hochtemperatur-Reaktors.

 

Diese Mobbing-Attacken waren erstaunlich dreist

Da wurde nichts akzeptiert um dem Leser darzulegen :

Das ist ein Troll, der nicht gefüttert werden darf. 

 

Allerdings gab es auch sachliche Beiträge. Bei diesen Leuten möchte ich mich nachträglich bedanken. 

 

Gerade wegen dieser unfairen Mobbing-Attacken wird die wissenschaftliche Argumentation noch einmal widerholt:

 

Die etablierte Schul-Physik rechnet  wegen E = eV = mc² :

 

2,55 eV Energie des Photons / c  =  Impuls  

h / Lambda im Vakuum    =  m c.

Mit Photonenenergie der Sonne eV / c = m c   wird also Meerwasser warm gemacht,

Das Meerwasseer erwärmt sich demnach durch den angenommenen Impuls 2,55 eV / c .


Sonnenphotonen der Energie von 2,55 eV können  Elektronen im Meerwasser nicht bewegen, weil die Ruhemasse der Elektronen mit 0,5109989461MeV/c² rund 200 000 mal größer ist.


Wie wird dann überhaupt Meerwasser warm, wenn der Comptoneffekt nur mit Röntgenphotonen funktioniert? Beim Compton-Versuch wird Graphit verwendet.

Das 2,55 eV Photon kann kein Elektron aus dem Graphitblock herausschlagen, weil es 200 000 mal leichter ist, als das Elektron im Graphitblock.


Die bisherigen Annahmen der Schulphysik sind auf einmal sehr fragwürdig. Denn die Annahme des Lichtphotons beim Compton-Effekt widerspricht dem realen Compton-Versuch. ( mit Röntgenphotonen)

 

Hier schweigt des Sängers Höflichkeit. Gymnasien und Universitäten antworteten nicht auf Anfragen.


Wie funktioniert Quanten-Physik  über das Neue  erweiterte Ohmsche Gesetz ?


U / f Sonne * Anzahl e f² in Meerwasseratomen =

U Anzahl e f  = Watt im Meerwasser.

Watt im Meerwasser = Leistung = Delta  Meerwassertemperatur.


Der Kühlschrank  hat am Kühlgitter auf der Rückseite Wärmeleistung und keine Wärmeenergie Joule = h f. Der Kühlschrank hat Kühlleistung und keine Kälteenergie.


H2 + O  = H2O + Leistung = Watt

Die Chemiker sagten bisher, weil sie sich an der Physik orientieren :

H2 + O  = H2O + Energie.

Die Chemiker haben – wie auch Albert Einstein- die Resonanzfrequenz vergessen.

Leistung = Energie hf * Resonanzfrequenz = h f²= Watt.

Da wollte doch ein promovierter Physiker im genannten Forum erzählen,dass explodierender Wasserstoff Energie und keine Leistung habe.


Es gibt weder Photonen noch elektromagnetischen Wellen im Vakuum. Es gibt im Vakuum nur den magnetischen Fluss U / f.

 


Das erweiterte Ohm'sche Gesetz :

 

P = I * U  im Atom. Das Atom wird als Halbwellendipol angesehen

 

I  = Anzahl e f im Atom = Ampere 

U   = h f / Anzahl e  im Atom = Potentielle Energie im Atom.

Anzahl e f² = Ampere * Resonanzfrequenz im Atom

R = h / Anzahl e² im Atom

 

 

Gravitation = Delta U von Atomen = Delta Epot endotherm im Einzelatom.

 

Licht der Glühlampe = P / Ampere * Resonanzfrequenz =  U / f exotherm

aus dem Glühwendel der Glühlampe. Da kommt also kein Photon der Energie h f heraus! 

 

Hochtemperatur-Reaktoren nutzen - wie  beim Compton-Experiment - Graphit als Moderator - und Heliumgas  als Kühlmittel.

Graphit bremst durch mehrfachen elastischen Stoß seiner Atomkerne  "schnelle Neutronen" ab. Nur mit "langsamen Neutronen" kann " Kernspaltung" stattfinden.

Aus dem "Spaltungsprozess" müssen daher Graphitstäbe entfernt werden, um den Spaltungsprozess mit langsamen Neutronen zu unterbinden.

So erklären das Atomphysiker vereinfacht.

 

Was sich  genau abspielt wird hier erklärt :: 

 

Radioaktives Material U Anzahl e f  / e f² radioaktives Material

= U / f.

U / f  vom radioaktivem Material * Anzahl ef²  Graphitatom =

U Anzahl e f  = Watt im Graphitatom.

Watt im Graphitatom ./ Anzahl e f² im Graphitatom = U / f aus dem Graphitatom.

U / f pendelt zwischen Graphit und radioaktivem Material hin und her bei immer weiter steigender Temperatur

Wir erleben eine Resonanzkatastrophe, wenn nicht mit Helium gekühlt und Graphit reguliert wird.

 

Wir kennen die Atomkraft, sagen Physiker.............. 

glauben aber weiterhin an ionisierende,. nicht ionisierende Alpha, Gamma und Beta-Strahlung, obwohl der magnetische Fluss U/f als neues "Wechselwirkungsteichen" des Elektromagnetismus  alle Strahlungsarten umfasst..

 

Wechselwirkungsteilchen des Elektromagnetismus ist nicht das Photon mit der Energie eV, sondern der magnetische Fluss U/f = Vs.

Oder glauben Sie noch daran, dass

2,55 eV / c im Atom = Ruhemasse * Lichtgeschwindigkeit c ist?.

 

Fällt Americum-Strahlung U/f zwischen die Platten eines geladenen Kondensators, dann entsteht zwischen den Platten des Kondensators ein leitender Lichtbogen mit der Eigenschaft

Anzahl e f², also  mit Ampere * Resonanzfrequenz  ein elektrischer Fluss.

Im Kondensator entsteht demnach  U/f * Anzahl ef² =

U Anzahl e f = Watt = Leistung,, die Kondensatorplatten verbrennen kann..

 

Will die Schulphysik diese Erkenntnis eigentlich weiter unter den Teppich kehren?

 

Soll die Bevölkerung  mit sehr fragwürdigen wissenschaftlichen Formeln der Bundesnetzagentur ( P / 4 Pi r²) statt ( P / c) einer Mobilfunkantenne in Sicherheit gewiegt werden?

Die Bevölkerung hat ein Recht zu erfahren, dass die bisherigen Kenntnisse der Atomphysiker über atomare Prozesse mehr als mangelhaft waren. Das betrifft auch die Endlagerung des Atommülls.

.

Zur Zeit versuchen Ministerien und die Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft in Bad Honnef das Thema national tot zu schweigen.

 

  

 

„ Ein einfallende Teilchen“ ist nach bisheriger Vorstellung der Wissenschaft das elektromagnetische Photon mit der Energie

h f oder eV. Es gilt als Wechselwirkungsteilchen des Elektromagnetismus.

 

Die Ruhemasse ist rund 200000 s^2 m^-2 größer als die Energie von 2,55 eV des einfallenden Photons im Meerwasser.

 

Das Photon  der Energie  2,55 eV kann daher das Elektron der Ruhemasse von 0,511 MeV im Meerwasser nicht bewegen.

Das bedeutet : Die Sonne mit Photonen der Energie von 2,55 eV kann Meerwasser nicht erwärmen, weil diese  Elektronen der Masse 0,511 MeV im Meerwasser nicht bewegen können.

 

Der Wirkungsquerschnitt ( Erklärung im Internet) gehorcht im speziellen Fall  folgender Formel :

U / f magnetischer Sonnenfluss  * e f ²  ( Ampere * Resonanzfrequenz) Meerwasser = U Anzahl ef  = Watt  = Leistung = Delta Temperatur Meerwasser. Die Frequenz im Meerwasser = eV / h.

Im Meerwasser unterliegt also die Farbfrequenz

Watt / Energie   des Wassers  

dem magnetischen Sonnenfluss U / f.

h / Anzahl e im Wasser ist äquivalent mit dem magnetischen Sonnenfluss U/f. 

Die Farbe des Meerwassers mit Watt/ Energie = f   kann blau, schwarz aber auch grün sein. Es kommt eben auf den magnetischen Sonnenfluss U/f  an, der durch Bewölkung gesteuert wird.

 

Diese Feststellung hat katastrophale Auswirkungen in der Schulphysik.

Relativitätstheorien und Quantenmechanik sind widerlegt.

 

Denn die Schulphysik kann mit dem bisherigen elektromagnetischen Wechselwirkungsteilchen, dem Photon, den beschriebenen Vorgang nicht erklären und bei den Maxwellgleichungen fehlt nach wie vor der experimentelle Beweis, dass der Feldwellenwiderstand von 376,73 Ohm

im Vakuum überhaupt existiert.

Damit bleibt nur eine Möglichkeit : Die Sonne und der neue Fusions-Reaktor in Greifswald exportieren den magnetischen Fluss U/f.

Die physikalisch-theoretische  Vorstellung eines isotropen Punktstrahlers wurde durch die real existierende Leuchtdiode ersetzt.:.

P / c = R Anzahl e in der Leuchtdiode = U/f  exotherm

= Licht im Vakuum.

f / U = Anzahl e f / U Anzahl e = Ampere / potentielle Energie =

Gravitation endotherm in einer Leuchtdiode.

( Siehe Bild 3b, Englischsprachige Gedankensammlung)

 

"Es ist wichtig einzusehen, dass wir in der heutigen Physik nicht wissen, was Energie ist. Wir haben kein Bild davon, dass Energie in kleinen Klumpen definierter Größe vorkommt" 

Physiknobelpreisträger Richard Feynman

Der Autor rechnet vor :

 

Energie = Leistung / Frequenz in der Materie.

Im leeren Raum können demnach aus Energie keine materiellen Teilchen entstehen, oder?

 

 

Impressum and Copyright : 2016 - 2017 

Jürgen Gerwing, Siegenerstr. 39, D 57399 Kirchhundem